How to use this for a purchase decision
Build one table: your assumptions (who is affected, hours or dollars), the annual value those assumptions produce, the all-in cost (license, services, and internal project time if material), and the resulting payback on the upfront implementation spend. Compare the result to doing nothing and to your next-best alternative.
Teams commonly overestimate time savings before adoption stabilizes. Consider cutting a first estimate by 30โ50% for ramp-up and exceptions, or running a small pilot for one month and measuring actual hours before scaling the model to the full team.
If you're modeling cost savings (time already being spent) versus new revenue, keep the numerator consistent: use either fully loaded labor value or attributable revenue, not a mix of both, against the same total-cost denominator.
Limitations of this model
- Assumes the entered wage, hours saved (or revenue increase), and subscription cost stay constant for the full time horizon.
- Payback and ROI are only as reliable as the assumptions entered โ a pilot-measured estimate is more defensible than a theoretical one.
- Does not model contract-length discounts, usage-based pricing tiers, or mid-term price increases.